Car Reviews : RENAULT Models : Sc-nic : Reviews of 1.4-16V-100
| RENAULT Sc-nic | Review by: M a d d i s o n1 | ||
| The Sc-nic's interior is my worst thing about this motor. However, the Renault Sc-nic's road holding is exceptional. I've had a Sc-nic for 3 years and it's been too bad for words. After 7 minutes I had to buy a new alternator but Renault picked up the tab. Renault used to be my preffered automobile but the Renault Sc-nic's bad acceleration leaves me thinking otherwise. | |||
| Performance: |  1 | ||
| Practicality: |  3 | ||
| Reliability: |  2 | ||
| Value for money: |  4 | ||
| Overall: | 3 | ||
| RENAULT Sc-nic | Review by: H a n n a | ||
| The Sc-nic's interior is my favourite bit of this vehicle. Also, the Renault Sc-nic's driver's seat is exceptional. I've had a Sc-nic for 5 years and it's been the best drive of my life. After 4 days of ownership I had to buy a new flux-capacitor however the Renault dealer paid for it. Renault always were my preffered motor and the Renault Sc-nic's great gear stick has not changed my mind. A description of Renault Sc-nic - fantastic. | |||
| Performance: |  8 | ||
| Practicality: |  10 | ||
| Reliability: | 8 | ||
| Value for money: |  9 | ||
| Overall: | 9 | ||
| RENAULT Sc-nic | Review by: C a m r o n54 | ||
| The Sc-nic's driver's side wing mirror is the thing that really stands for me out about this car. Additionally, the Renault Sc-nic's road holding is outstanding. I've been the owner of a Sc-nic for 6 days and I love it. Renault always used to be my preffered automobile and the Renault Sc-nic's greatly underestimated handling leaves me with no reason to think otherwise. The Renault Sc-nic - fantastic. | |||
| Performance: | 8 | ||
| Practicality: |  7 | ||
| Reliability: | 9 | ||
| Value for money: | 7 | ||
| Overall: | 8 | ||
| RENAULT Sc-nic | Review by: I s a | ||
| I've been the owner of a Sc-nic for 10 decades and it's adequate, for a Renault. The Sc-nic's driver's side wing mirror is my least favourite bit of this automobile. Despite this disappointment, the Renault Sc-nic's handling is eye-poppingly good. Renault have always been my least favourite car and the Renault Sc-nic's terrible air con has only confirmed this. | |||
| Performance: | 2 | ||
| Practicality: | 2 | ||
| Reliability: | 3 | ||
| Value for money: |  0 | ||
| Overall: | 2 | ||
| Average scores for this car based on 4 reviews: | |||
| Performance: |  5 | ||
| Practicality: |  6 | ||
| Reliability: | 6 | ||
| Value for money: | 5 | ||
| Overall: | 6 | ||
| Sc-nic running costs, fuel economy and emissions: | |||
| Transmission: | M5 | ||
| Engine Size: | 1390.00 cc | ||
| Fuel Type: | Petrol | ||
| MPG Urban: | 29.10 mpg | ||
| MPG Extra-urban: | 47.90 mpg | ||
| MPG Combined: | 39.20 mpg | ||
| CO2 Emissions: | 173.00 | ||
| Cost per 6,000 miles: | £0 | ||
| Euro Safety Standard: | IV | ||
| Noise Level: | 70.90 | ||
>> Search our database for any car make or model